Case Studies
Join Assembly
We were able to hire a Staff level Talent, which was crucial for the growth of our company at an early stage.
- Industry
- HRTech, Software Development
- Team Size
- 11-50 Employees
- Funding
- Seed
- Reviewed By
- Head of Engineering
- Website
- joinassembly.com
Verified by Clutch. The client submitted this review online.
Recruitment Services for HR SaaS Company
Head of Engineering · Software · 11-50 Employees · Los Angeles, California
Project feedback
With Canada Mentors' help, the client has managed to fill a crucial staff-level position within the expected timeframe. The team communicates clearly and consistently to ensure both sides are always on the same page. They also work thoroughly in terms of searching and endorsing the right candidates.
"They actively communicate with us."
Project summary
Canada Mentors is helping an HR SaaS company recruit experienced engineers. They're in charge of the recruitment process, from searching and evaluating candidates to scheduling interviews.
Client rating
| Rating | Score |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 5.0 |
| Scheduling (on time / deadlines) | 5.0 |
| Cost (value / within estimates) | 5.0 |
| Quality (service & deliverables) | 5.0 |
| NPS (willing to refer) | 5.0 |
The Challenge
For what projects/services did your company hire Canada Mentors, and what were your goals?
We were growing our Engineering team in the Americas & needed assistance sourcing experienced Engineering candidates.
Solution
How did you select Canada Mentors and what were the deciding factors?
I had engaged with Canada Mentors as a candidate previously & enjoyed the interactions with them at that time, so it was a no-brainer to use their services for our needs.
Describe the project in detail and walk through their service package.
They started by understanding our company, the type of candidates we were looking for, and the process and skill expectations for each role. After the kickoff process, they started sending us profiles of candidates in their pipeline, and their evaluation of each candidate & they would then help us schedule an interview with them. Throughout the entire interview process, they would engage both us and the candidate to ensure that the candidates don't drop off mid-process. Once a candidate is selected, they'd stay on top of it to help ensure that we close the offer in a reasonable time.
The Outcome
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
They helped us close a staff-level role that was crucial for us.
What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?
Whenever a candidate wouldn't fit our needs, they took the time to understand the reason for the rejection so that they could adjust future candidate suggestions based on that which has been helpful.
Are there any areas for improvement or something they could have done differently?
None.
See the original review on Clutch
